I really don't know how Slaughterhouse-five and Catch-22 use similar motifs to convey their anti-war message??

I don't understand how their anti-war message is similar if that makes more sense.

Compare and contrast:

http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/slaughter/themes.html

http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/catch22/themes.html

thanks, but i still don't understand

To understand how the novels Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut and Catch-22 by Joseph Heller use similar motifs to convey their anti-war message, we first need to look at what motifs are and how they contribute to the theme of a literary work.

Motifs are recurring elements or symbols that serve to support the main theme of a story. They can be images, objects, ideas, or even narrative techniques. In the context of anti-war literature, motifs are used to emphasize the horrors, absurdity, and futility of war, and to question the logic behind it.

In Slaughterhouse-Five, one of the central motifs is the phrase "So it goes." This phrase is repeated throughout the book whenever someone dies, regardless of the circumstances. Vonnegut uses it to convey a sense of resignation and acceptance towards death, highlighting the dehumanizing effects of war and the vast number of lives lost. Another motif in the novel is the concept of time travel, which is employed to challenge linear narratives and disrupt the traditional understanding of cause and effect. This motif underscores the chaotic and disorienting experience of war.

Similarly, in Catch-22, Heller utilizes several motifs to convey the anti-war message. One prominent motif is the Catch-22 itself, which refers to a bureaucratic rule that states one cannot be released from combat duty unless they are deemed insane, but asking to be deemed insane is considered a rational act, thus making one inherently sane. This absurd logic not only highlights the irrationality and arbitrary nature of war, but also the Catch-22 becomes a symbol for the web of contradictions and paradoxes that trap the characters in a system they cannot escape. Another motif in the novel is the constant theme of circularity and repetition. The same events, dialogues, and situations occur repeatedly, creating a sense of futility and the feeling of being caught in an endless cycle of war.

By examining these motifs, we can see that both Slaughterhouse-Five and Catch-22 share a similar approach to conveying their anti-war message. They both utilize repetition, absurdity, and the disruption of narrative conventions to challenge the glorification of war, expose its negative impacts, and question its inherent reasoning. These techniques aim to provoke readers into critically reflecting on the devastating consequences of war and the need for change.

To fully grasp the similarities and nuances in how these motifs are used in each novel, it is recommended to read both books carefully, paying close attention to the recurring symbols and themes, as well as the author's narrative choices in presenting the anti-war message.