Without our two great political parties cutting across economic and geographic interests, democracy as we know it could never have been made to function." The author of this statement probably meant to suggest that?

Please type your subject in the School Subject box. Any other words are likely to delay responses from a teacher who knows that subject well.

Please also understand that no one here will do your work for you. However, we will be happy to read over whatever you come up with and make suggestions and/or corrections.

Please post what you think.

You might also want to read what was posted when this very question was asked 5 days ago.

http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1262763318

To understand the intended meaning of this statement, we can break it down:

1. "Without our two great political parties": The statement suggests the importance of political parties in the functioning of democracy.
2. "Cutting across economic and geographic interests": This implies that the political parties transcend boundaries based on economic and geographic factors, indicating their ability to bring together diverse groups of people.
3. "Democracy as we know it could never have been made to function": The author is recognizing the significant role that political parties play in making democracy work.

Based on these elements, the author likely meant that political parties are an essential component of democracy. They help bridge different economic and geographic interests, allowing for effective governance and the functioning of democratic processes. Without political parties, the author suggests that democracy would not be able to operate effectively as it does.