Wednesday

March 4, 2015

March 4, 2015

Posted by **Anonymous** on Wednesday, December 9, 2009 at 2:41pm.

For example:

My book states that zeros that come before a digit are NEVER significant. Now this makes sense if you have a number like 0.123 which would have three significant figures... But the book gives the example of 0.0055 which it says only has two significant figures. This isn't logical to me! 0.0055 IS NOT the same as .55 so how can those two zeros after the decimal point, not be significant?

The other part that confuses me is when zeros come after the numbers. For example, .3400 has four significant figures. This isn't logical to me either. Isn't .3400 the same as .34? I feel like these rules are wrong and should be switched around.

Is there something I'm not understanding about significant figures that would shed some light on these rules?

- Science -
**SraJMcGin**, Wednesday, December 9, 2009 at 7:23pmYou should find help in a tutorial:

http://www.google.com/search?q=significant+figures+tutorial&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Sra

**Answer this Question**

**Related Questions**

Science (Chemistry!) - I just do not understand ANYTHING about multiplying/...

Physics - Talking about significant figures, my Physics textbook lists 5 rules ...

Significant figures - How would I go and express these numbers with 3 ...

Science Significant Figures - Calculate the area, with the appropriate number of...

significant figures - 82.453 in 3 significant figures with scientific notation...

math - significant numbers 2.8723 * 1.6 = 4.59568. Is it 4.6 because it is the ...

SCIENCE - PLEASE HELP PLESE - 1) Round 578.683 m, 47.3333 kg, and 789.5 cm to ...

Math in Science - A student measures the volume of a liquid and finds it to be ...

significant figures - hi what is 43342 to 1sf because my old maths teacher said ...

physics - Using the following number: 26,802 In 4 significant figures, this ...