What would happen if Judiciary Review didn't exist. That is what would the differences be today in Judicial Review hadnt come into place from the Marbury v madison case. I mean,, i know that obviously all these cases would have never been decided. but what else??

If Judicial Review had not come into place from the Marbury v. Madison case, there would have been several significant differences in our legal and political system today. Here's an explanation of what those differences might be:

1. Limited power of the Supreme Court: Judicial Review established the Supreme Court as the final arbiter in interpreting the Constitution and determining the constitutionality of laws and executive actions. Without it, the Court would have limited authority to review and strike down potentially unconstitutional laws and actions. This would significantly reduce the Court's power and its role in shaping public policy.

2. Unclear separation of powers: Judicial Review was instrumental in defining the separation of powers among the three branches of government. Without it, there would be more ambiguity and potential conflicts between the branches. The executive and legislative branches would have more unchecked power, potentially leading to abuses of authority and infringements on individual rights.

3. Inadequate protection of individual rights: Judicial Review has played a crucial role in safeguarding individual rights by striking down unconstitutional laws that infringe upon those rights. Without it, there would be less protection for civil liberties and no mechanism to prevent the majority from infringing upon the rights of minorities.

4. Limited check on government overreach: Judicial Review acts as a check on government actions that exceed constitutional limits. Without this mechanism, there would be fewer restrictions on government overreach, leading to potential abuses of power and erosion of democratic principles.

5. Reduced legal stability and precedent: Judicial Review has resulted in a long history of legal precedents that guide future decisions and provide certainty and stability in the law. Without it, legal decisions would lack consistent guiding principles, leading to increased uncertainty, inconsistency, and potential confusion in the interpretation and application of the law.

Overall, the absence of Judicial Review would significantly alter the balance of power among the branches of government, limit the protection of individual rights, reduce checks on government overreach, and create a less predictable legal system.