hi can anyone help me with this paper? this is the basis of the paper
I. Statement of Aristotle’s Metaphysical Proposal
A. Aristotle’s argument in favor an Absolute Being
B. Nature of Aristotle’s Absolute
C. The relation of his Absolute to the realm of material substances
II. Statement of Rielo’s Metaphysical Proposal
A. Rielo’s argument in favor of his Absolute Subject
B. Nature of Rielo’s Absolute
C. The relation of his Absolute to the realm of nature (include the
relation of the Absolute Subject to the human person)
III. Evaluate the two proposals (which do you find most convincing and
why)
As the basis of a comparison/contrast paper, this is fine.
Once you've written up these sections, you'll have the rough draft of the body of your paper. After you have revised and streamlined these sections, then you'll be ready to write an introduction and a conclusion for the paper.
Here are two excellent websites for helping you with the writing process, as well as grammar and usage:
http://leo.stcloudstate.edu/catalogue.html
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/
Certainly, I can help you with your paper. It looks like you're discussing the metaphysical proposals of Aristotle and Rielo. To write this paper, you'll need to understand their proposals and evaluate which one you find most convincing. Here's a step-by-step guide on how to approach each section of your paper:
I. Statement of Aristotle’s Metaphysical Proposal:
A. To understand Aristotle's argument in favor of an Absolute Being, you need to read and analyze his works like "Metaphysics." Look for Aristotle's claims about the existence and nature of an Absolute Being.
B. In this subsection, explain the nature of Aristotle's Absolute. What are its characteristics? How does he define its essence and attributes?
C. Here, discuss Aristotle's view on the relation of his Absolute to the realm of material substances. How does the Absolute interact with the physical world, according to Aristotle?
II. Statement of Rielo’s Metaphysical Proposal:
A. For Rielo's argument in favor of his Absolute Subject, you'll need to study his works or any relevant writings. Look for Rielo's reasoning and evidence supporting the existence of an Absolute Subject.
B. Describe the nature of Rielo's Absolute. What qualities or properties does he assign to it? How does he define its essence and attributes?
C. This subsection should cover the relation of Rielo's Absolute to the realm of nature and, specifically, the relation of the Absolute Subject to the human person. How does Rielo explain the connection between his Absolute and the natural world, including its impact on human beings?
III. Evaluate the two proposals:
In this section, you'll compare and contrast Aristotle's and Rielo's proposals. Consider their arguments, their concepts of the Absolute, and their understanding of its relation to the world. You can emphasize the strengths and weaknesses of each proposal, as well as any logical inconsistencies or unanswered questions.
Ultimately, it's important to provide your own perspective on which proposal you find most convincing and explain why. You can base your evaluation on aspects like logical consistency, empirical evidence, philosophical coherence, and personal beliefs.
Remember to support your points with references to relevant texts or scholarly sources and provide a well-structured and coherent argument. Good luck with your paper!