"Without Our Two Great Political Parties Cutting Across Economic And Geographic Interests, Democracy As We Know It Could Never Have Been Made To Function." The Author Of This Statement Probably Meant To Suggest That?

Our democracy should be representative of all peoples no matter how much money they make or where they live. The two political parties represent these diverse interests.

To understand the meaning behind the statement, we can break it down into parts and analyze them.

1. "Without Our Two Great Political Parties": This suggests that the author is referring to a political system with two major political parties.

2. "Cutting Across Economic And Geographic Interests": Here, it implies that these political parties encompass different economic and geographic groups. They have a broad base of support across various segments of the population.

3. "Democracy As We Know It": This refers to the currently functioning democratic system.

4. "Could Never Have Been Made To Function": This part implies that without these two major political parties, the democratic system would not be able to work effectively.

Based on these elements, the author is likely suggesting that the democratic system, as we know it, relies on two major political parties that represent diverse economic and geographic interests. These parties provide a platform for a wide range of citizens to have a voice in the political process and ensure the functioning of a democratic system.

In summary, the author is indicating that having two major political parties helps to represent and balance the economic and geographic interests within a democracy, which contributes to its functioning.