I need an article from a newspaper or something published between the dats of September 10 2009 till December 4 , 2009. It must be a weak argument that has fallacies and can be refuted by counter examples. For the assignment i need to reconstruct the argument with its premises and subconclusions and conclusions

Read through some of these editorials.

http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUS353&q=editorials

To find an article from a newspaper or any publication between September 10, 2009, and December 4, 2009, you have a few options:

1. Online Archives: Many newspapers have online archives where you can search for articles from specific dates. Visit the websites of major newspapers like The New York Times, The Washington Post, or The Guardian. Use their search function or navigate to their archives section to find articles published within your specified time frame.

2. Databases: Academic databases like JSTOR or ProQuest offer access to a wide range of publications, including newspapers and magazines. You may have access to these databases through your school or local library. Use the publication date filters and relevant keywords to narrow down your search.

3. Physical Libraries: If you have access to a local library, they might have physical copies of newspapers published during the period you mentioned. Look for the newspaper section within the library and ask the librarian for assistance.

Once you find an article that meets your criteria, carefully analyze it to identify weak arguments and fallacies. Here's a general guide on how to reconstruct the argument:

1. Identify the main conclusion: Determine the core message or claim the author is trying to make. Look for statements that express a position or express a judgment on a particular matter.

2. Identify sub-conclusions: Identify any additional claims that support the main conclusion. Look for premises or reasons provided by the author to support their main argument.

3. Identify premises: Identify the reasons or evidence presented by the author to support the sub-conclusions. Premises are statements that provide support to the claims made.

4. Evaluate the argument and find fallacies: Assess the strength of each premise and sub-conclusion. Look for logical fallacies, such as ad hominem attacks, false cause-effect relationships, appeals to authority, or hasty generalizations.

5. Create a structured argument: Once you have identified the main conclusion, sub-conclusions, and premises, reconstruct the argument in a logical format, such as using numbers or letters to indicate the order of premises and sub-conclusions.

Remember to ensure that the article you choose is appropriate for your assignment and follows any specific guidelines provided by your instructor.