Posted by charmy on Monday, November 9, 2009 at 8:22pm.
This article may help you.
http://www.historyguide.org/earlymod/lecture7c.html
http://british-empire.suite101.com/article.cfm/origins_of_the_english_civil_war
First the Scots, then the Irish, rebelled against the King who had to then respond,but he had no money. Parliament in the end, did not give money to Charles, but managed the funds thru themselves, and in the end, those who controlled the purse strings, controlled who won.
hmm i read it so many times on my texbook. well charles himself started the war cuz he always wants money rite? but then the parliament wont give him any. and then becuz the grand remonstrance thingy, charles wasnt happy about it so he lead an army and invaded the house of commons, then the war started rite? so this is a political war? not a religious?
but still, i cant think of any reason why he DIDNT force parliament to fight bak, to start the war. becuz hes just so obssesed wif money he lost himself? and then ppl hate charles? i dun GET IT.
Related Questions
social studies 9 - Charles's support came from the north and west of ...
History - Can someone give me a few examples of economic factors/conditions ...
social studies - how are some African people and nations working to improve ...
Social Studies - Describe the political, social, economic conditions in the U.S ...
History - I need to find three social and economic similarities in the South and...
Social Studies - What were the economic conditions in the United States when the...
Geography - 17. Why have the people of West Africa started to work at the local ...
history - How did hitler's economic policies affect germany before world war...
History - 1) sketch out the contours of US history between 1789 and 1865 2) ...
college - Social, political, or economic conditions can alter the nature and ...
For Further Reading