Whether or not the leader has done the right thing is based on the perception by a consensus of reasonable people is true?
How do you define "right" thing and "reasonable" people.
Many leaders have done the wrong thing, although so-called reasonable people around them have believed it to be the right thing at the time.
true
Yes, the statement "Whether or not the leader has done the right thing is based on the perception by a consensus of reasonable people" can be considered true. The evaluation of a leader's actions often depends on the perspective of those observing and assessing the situation.
To determine whether a leader has done the right thing, a common approach is to seek the collective opinion or judgment of a consensus of reasonable people. This means gathering the viewpoints of individuals who are capable of rational thinking and sound judgment, without any extreme bias or prejudice.
Obtaining a consensus involves considering various factors, such as the leader's intentions, the consequences of their actions, and the ethical framework they adhere to. Different people may have different interpretations of what constitutes the right thing, so it's important to hear from a diverse set of perspectives.
Engaging in discussions, conducting surveys or opinion polls, or seeking feedback from a representative sample of the population are common methods to gauge the perception of reasonable people and form a consensus.
It's crucial to note that while consensus can be valuable in assessing a leader's actions, it does not guarantee absolute correctness. People's perceptions can be influenced by personal biases, cultural or societal norms, and limited access to information. Therefore, arriving at a definitive conclusion on whether a leader's actions were right or wrong based solely on consensus may require careful consideration and critical thinking.