Posted by Sara on Monday, October 26, 2009 at 7:27pm.
Sara -- I'm sorry, but you missed the author's point entirely.
The author praises terror when it's used to punish the rich and selfish. He says if the only way the French people can be free is to kill the rich, then the terror is a good cause. Study the last sentence:
France must be entirely free or perish in the attempt, and any means are justifiable in fighting for so fine a cause....
oh, I'm so sorry, I wonder why I didn't get that. Thank you.
The Writer feels good about the use of terror, when it is used to punish the rich and selfish. Yes, I agree with him because the cause of terror are the rich themselves, so it really doesn't matter if that terror itself is going to end their lives.
Does this make sense? Also is there another word I can use instead of good?
The writer feels that this terror was justified.
Thank you, overall is my answer good?
Yes. Now you've the main idea of this editorial.
Thank you so much Ms. Sue, you are the best:-)
You're very welcome.
Related Questions
socials 9 - . What was the Reign of Terror? If you asked Robespierre how he, a ...
writing - I have a dispute with my teacher in 7th grade. In referring to ...
Socials=Ms. Sue - 3.Describe 3 events that happened during these years (Reign of...
socials 9 - What was the Reign of Terror? If you asked Robespierre how he, a man...
Socials=Ms.Sue - The Reign of Terror was a period of violence in the French ...
SOCIALS HELP...THANX - This question is based on: the Reign of Terror which ...
Socials - French Revolution 1.Why did the trial of the king happen? 2.Which ...
To Anyone - 6.What event concluded the Reign of Terror? Robespierre's death ...
History - was the Reign of Terror necessary to preserve the French Revolution?
world history honors - was the reign of terror neccesary for the French ...
For Further Reading