Constitutional scholars have pointed out there is an inconsistency in Justice Marshall's opinion with respect to what the constitution specifically provides. What is that inconsistency?

Question answered below.

Vuuvuutktv

To determine the inconsistency in Justice Marshall's opinion, we would need to refer to a specific case or opinion where this is discussed. Without additional information, it is difficult to provide a precise answer. However, I can explain how you can find out more about Justice Marshall's opinions and the alleged inconsistency:

1. Identify the case: Research the context or specific case where Justice Marshall's opinion is being referred to. This will help you understand the specific arguments made and why scholars believe there is an inconsistency.

2. Study Justice Marshall's opinions: Read the relevant opinions or legal writings by Justice Marshall. By examining his arguments and reasoning, you may discover the alleged inconsistency firsthand.

3. Consult legal analysis: Look for scholarly articles, books, or commentaries discussing Justice Marshall's opinions. Constitutional scholars often provide analysis and critique, highlighting any inconsistencies they believe exist.

4. Compare with the Constitution: Examine the specific provisions of the Constitution that are relevant to the case or opinion in question. Scholars may argue that Justice Marshall's opinion deviates from the original intent, text, or structure of these constitutional provisions.

5. Evaluate counter-arguments: Look for any counter-arguments or perspectives challenging the assertion of an inconsistency. Legal debates often involve multiple interpretations, and it's important to consider different viewpoints.

By following these steps, you can research and gain a deeper understanding of the alleged inconsistency in Justice Marshall's opinion as pointed out by constitutional scholars.