When you are building an argument for an issue that is significant to you , do you think it is more important to be valid or sound ? Why or why not ?

The question is asking what you think.

Do you know the difference between valid and sound? http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_difference_between_valid_and_sound_argument

When building an argument for an issue that is significant to you, it is important to strive for both validity and soundness. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument, while soundness denotes both logical validity and true premises. Both aspects are crucial for constructing a strong and persuasive argument.

Validity ensures that the argument follows a logical structure where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. In other words, it tests the coherence and logical consistency of the argument. To evaluate the validity of an argument, you can use logical reasoning to assess whether the conclusion genuinely follows from the provided premises. If the argument is not valid, then it fails to provide sufficient evidence or reasoning to support the conclusion, making it weak and potentially unpersuasive.

Soundness builds upon validity by incorporating the truth of the premises. A sound argument is not only logically valid but also based on true premises. This means that the information used to support the argument is accurate and reliable. Soundness strengthens the argument's credibility and persuasiveness because it demonstrates that not only is the argument logically coherent, but it is also grounded in truth.

In summary, both validity and soundness are crucial when building an argument for an issue significant to you. Validity ensures that the argument is logically structured, while soundness adds the element of truth to the premises. While a valid argument guarantees logical coherence, a sound argument goes a step further by providing a solid foundation of truth to strengthen the reliability and persuasiveness of your argument.