Posted by Mike on Tuesday, October 20, 2009 at 11:47pm.
A valid syllogism is:
All A are B
C is A
therefore
(since C is A and all A are B)
C is B
The non-syllogism above is:
All A are B
All C are B
Therefore all A are B.
Erm, no.
Spot the difference. Here's one of the same form:
All fish are animals
All birds are animals
Therefore all fish are birds.
Related Questions
science** - many birds eat butterflies for food. however, the monarch butterfly ...
biology - which animals eat butterflies? i know that birds do feed on ...
Algebra 1 Please bobpursley - This is what the exact paper says Algebra 1 PAP ...
biology - This is to do with genetics and drosophila. There are 3 pairs of ...
Biology - This is to do with genetics and drosophila. There are 3 pairs of ...
science - monarch butterflies migrate from newyork at a certain time of the year...
critical thinking - if we reason from the fact that all A's observed so far ...
critical thinking - if we reason from the fact that all A's observed so far ...
biology - The Eastern skunk cabbage, which blooms in very early spring, produces...
critical thinking - is this an example of an invalid argument All crows are ...
For Further Reading