Posted by Jamie on Saturday, October 10, 2009 at 8:13pm.
I'd say they would never hit the water at the same time because the first stone had a initial DOWNWARD velocity of 2.08 m/s. The second stone lost one second plus it started at zero vertical velocity.
If the situation is reversed, if the second stone is given an initial downward velocity of 2.08 m/s, there is a chance they may hit the water together.
(1)
Using
S=vertical distance travelled, m
t = time in seconds since release of first stone.
S = 0*t+(1/2)(-g)t² = 2.08*(t-1)+(1/2)(-g)(t-1)²
Solve for t
(2)
v(first) = 0+(-g)*t
v(second) = 2.08+(-g)*(t-1)
Related Questions
physics - . An inquisitive physics student and mountain climber climbs a 50.0-m ...
Physics - Hi guys, need help with this problem for physics and im having trouble...
physics - A rock climber stands on top of a 56m -high cliff overhanging a pool ...
physics - Two stones are thrown simultaneously, one straight upward from the ...
Physics - A mountain climber, in the process of crossing between two cliffs by a...
Physics - A mountain climber, in the process of crossing between two cliffs by a...
physics - A rock climber throws a small first aid kit to another climber who is ...
physics - A mountain climber, in the process of crossing between two cliffs by a...
Physics 1 - From the top of a cliff overlooking a lake, a person throws two ...
Physics - A 80 kg climber is standing horizontally on a perfectly vertical cliff...
For Further Reading