I have just one more question. Should Congress play a greater role in the formation of American foreign policy? Why or why not?

I think Congress shouln't, because they may not want the president to reach an agreement with another country, so that country may become upset with America. Does this sound like a good reasoning? If not, then what role does Congress have in American foreign policy?

Thanks!

Your reasoning does touch upon one aspect of the debate surrounding Congress's role in American foreign policy. However, it is just one perspective, and there are several factors to consider when evaluating whether Congress should play a greater role in this matter.

First, let's understand the constitutional framework. According to the U.S. Constitution, the president has the power to negotiate treaties and nominate ambassadors, while Congress has the power to approve treaties and confirm ambassadors. This division of power aims to ensure checks and balances within the government.

The argument for Congress playing a greater role in foreign policy is rooted in democratic principles. Proponents believe that decisions regarding international agreements should be made collectively and with the input of elected representatives. By involving Congress more extensively in foreign policy, it allows for broader perspectives and a more representative decision-making process.

Furthermore, Congress has oversight responsibilities, meaning it can review, monitor, and influence the actions of the executive branch, including foreign policy decisions. Through committee hearings, investigations, and the power of the purse, Congress can hold the president accountable and shape foreign policy outcomes.

On the other hand, critics argue that a more significant role for Congress in foreign policy could lead to inefficiency and slow decision-making. They contend that foreign policy requires agility and the ability to act swiftly, which might be hindered by the need for extensive congressional approval.

Another consideration is the potential for gridlock or partisan politics to influence foreign policy decisions. Congress, as a legislative body composed of diverse political interests, may face challenges reaching consensus on complex global issues. This could impede effective foreign policy formulation and implementation.

Ultimately, whether Congress should play a greater role in American foreign policy is a matter of political debate and personal opinion. Both perspectives have valid points, and finding the right balance between executive and legislative powers is an ongoing challenge in American governance.

To further explore this topic and form a well-informed opinion, you may consider reading scholarly articles, opinion pieces, and reports from reputable sources. Analyzing historical examples and examining debates within Congress can also provide valuable insights into the role Congress has played in shaping American foreign policy throughout history.

I agree with your answer.

The Constitution gives the President the power to conduct American foreign policy. If Congress doesn't like what the President has done, it can withhold funds for these policies.

The viewpoint expressed in this article is worth reading on this subject.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2007/10/congresss_new_role_undermining.html

You're welcome.