How do the Formal amendment process and constitutional change compare as expressions of popular sovereignty?

It takes the formal amendment process to effect a Constitutional change.

There's nothing to compare here.

Man, that was my problem too. Thanks though

VHDhgh

To compare the Formal amendment process and constitutional change as expressions of popular sovereignty, let's first understand the concept of popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty refers to the idea that power and authority in a government ultimately rest with the people.

1. Formal Amendment Process: The Formal amendment process refers to the specified method outlined in the Constitution itself for making changes or additions to the Constitution. This process involves two steps:
a. Proposal: Amendments are proposed by either a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress or by a national convention called by Congress at the request of two-thirds of the state legislatures.
b. Ratification: After proposal, amendments must be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures or by special state conventions called in three-fourths of the states.

2. Constitutional Change: Constitutional change, on the other hand, is a broader term that encompasses any modification or alteration made to the Constitution, whether through the formal amendment process or through other means, such as court interpretations or political practices. Constitutional change can occur through judicial review, executive actions, or social and political developments.

Comparing the two as expressions of popular sovereignty, here are the key differences and similarities:

Differences:
- The Formal amendment process is a more structured and formal method for making changes to the Constitution, requiring specific proposals and ratifications outlined by the Constitution itself.
- Constitutional change can occur through various means, including court decisions, executive actions, and evolving societal norms, without always adhering to the formal process.

Similarities:
- Both the Formal amendment process and constitutional change reflect popular sovereignty by acknowledging that ultimate authority resides with the people.
- Both processes allow for modifications to the Constitution over time to adapt to societal needs and changes in public opinion.

It is important to note that the Formal amendment process is considered the primary and most widely recognized method for making changes to the Constitution. However, constitutional change can also occur through other means, demonstrating the flexibility and adaptability of the Constitution as an embodiment of popular sovereignty.