wat is the difference between cooperation and peer review?
plz help and thank you
cooperation is working together and peer review is scientist reviewing the papers of other scientists submitted
is that right? sorta? can u fix my mistakes?
plz and thank you
Peer review doesn't have to be done by a scientist. A peer is a person who has a similar background to the writer. Fellow students are peers, for instance. So, a paper can be read and corrected by a peer -- a peer review.
Peer Review is when editors at a scientific journal ask experts on the field to read papers written by scientists to see if it has merit. If it does it is published.
Cooperation and peer review are two distinct concepts, although they can be related in some contexts. Let's start by understanding each term individually:
1. Cooperation: Cooperation refers to individuals or groups working together to achieve a common goal. It involves collaborating, sharing resources, and combining efforts to accomplish a task or solve a problem. Cooperation can occur in various settings, including teamwork within an organization, partnerships between companies, or even international collaborations.
To understand more about cooperation, you can consider the following steps:
1. Define the context: Identify the specific situation or context in which you want to understand cooperation.
2. Identify the individuals or groups involved: Determine who is involved and who needs to collaborate or work together.
3. Understand the goal: Define the common objective that the individuals or groups are trying to achieve. This will help establish the basis for cooperation.
4. Identify the methods or actions taken: Look into the specific ways the individuals or groups are collaborating, sharing resources, or combining efforts to achieve the common goal.
5. Assess the results: Evaluate the consequences or outcomes of the cooperation. Did it lead to the desired outcomes or not?
2. Peer review: Peer review is a process used to evaluate and ensure the quality, validity, and reliability of scholarly and research work. It involves subjecting academic papers, research articles, or proposals to scrutiny by experts in the same field or peers. The reviewers, who are typically qualified and knowledgeable individuals, assess the work for its originality, methodology, logical coherence, ethical standards, and overall contribution to the field.
To understand peer review better, consider the following steps:
1. Identify the scholarly or research work: Find the specific paper, article, or research proposal that underwent peer review.
2. Determine the field or subject area: Determine which scientific discipline or field of study the work belongs to.
3. Identify the reviewers: Discover who the experts or peers were that reviewed the work.
4. Understand the evaluation process: Learn about the criteria or standards used by the reviewers to assess the work. This can include elements like methodology, validity of data, relevance, clarity, and ethical considerations.
5. Assess the outcome of the review: Evaluate whether the work received positive feedback and was accepted, or if it faced critiques and required revisions.
It's worth noting that cooperation can be a part of the peer review process, as researchers and reviewers often collaborate in order to improve the quality of the work being evaluated. However, cooperation is a broader concept that encompasses various forms of collaboration beyond just the evaluation of scholarly work.
Check these sites and then post what you think the difference.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/cooperation