Thursday

July 24, 2014

July 24, 2014

Posted by **Very easy Math** on Wednesday, September 2, 2009 at 1:39pm.

could you prove it to me

-x = (-1)x

((-1)x)^-1

I don't see how I'm suppose to get + x by taking the inverse of -x i've always been told in math to just to the opposite of subbtraction which is addition but my teacher is telling me that is a lie and that it's really the inverse of subtraction is addition but I don't see the reasoning behind it

basically can you prove to me that the opposite of subractiion is addition and vise versa??? by taking the inverses????

I don't get it...

like I can prove that the opposite of multiplication is division by taking the inverse and can prove it just by defintion

(5x = 2)5^-1 = x = 5^-1 (2)

that's how you prove that relationship is really just inverses but what about addition and subtraction how are the inverse relationships...???

Thansk

- Very easy math -
**Writeacher**, Wednesday, September 2, 2009 at 1:56pmUse numbers.

6 + 2 = 8

Therefore, 8 - 6 = 2 or 8 - 2 = 6

How can you state those relationships in abstract terms?

- Very easy math -
**Count Iblis**, Wednesday, September 2, 2009 at 2:00pmIf x is some number and:

x + y = 0

then y is called an inverse (w.r.t. addition) of x

Then it follows from the same definition that x is an inverse of y. Now, what you need to prove is that inverses are unique. I.e. if for some given x

x + y = 0

and also

x + z = 0

you necessarily have y = z.

So, it then follows that the inverse of the inverse of x is x and it can't be anything else than x.

Then, if we denote the inverse of x by

-x, we can prove that:

-x = (-1)*x

THis is because:

x + (-1)*x =

1*x + (-1)*x =

(1 + (-1))*x =

0*x = 0

Here we have used that -1 is the inverse of 1.

So, (-1)*x satisfies the criterium the inverse of x which we always denote as

-x must satisfy and therefore

-x = (-1)*x

Then the fact that taking twice the inverse yields the same number implies that:

(-1)*(-1) = 1

- Very easy math -
**Very easy Math**, Wednesday, September 2, 2009 at 2:25pmi agree with all of it but still don't see how

X + B = C

we can simply solve for B by simply multiplying the whole equation by B^-1 which we note as -B because????

(X + B = C)B^-1

B cancels out

X = B^-1 C

what allows us to say that B^-1 is equal to -B

- Very easy math -
**bobpursley**, Wednesday, September 2, 2009 at 3:16pmYou are confusing terms:

Inverse is not the reciprocal. You are using reciprocal (B^-1) is reciprocal.

Now it is confusing, because the inverse operation to multiplication is division, and the inverse to division is multiplication

http://www.mathsisfun.com/definitions/inverse-operation.html

Watch the usage to "inverse", a lot of folks really mean reciprocal when they use it.

**Related Questions**

math - What inverse operation is needed for the first step in solving the ...

MATH 156 - What models can be used to help explain the concepts of addition and ...

math - An eighth-grade student claims she can prove that subtraction of integers...

Math - Using the definition of subtraction to determine the subtraction ...

Algebra - 55. Find the range of y = 2x + 1. a. all real numbers b. all positive ...

Algebra - 55. Find the range of y = 2x + 1. a. all real numbers b. all positive ...

Algebra - 55. Find the range of y = 2x + 1. a. all real numbers b. all positive ...

Algebra - 55. Find the range of y = 2x + 1. a. all real numbers b. all positive ...

math - 115-100+3*5= 115-100+3*5...Use BEDMAS (Bracket, Exponent, Division/...

math - What models can be used to help explain the concepts of addition and ...