What strategies does the author use to formulate his arguments? What makes the arguments so viable and compelling?
What do you think?
I am not sure at all. But I will think some more until I come up with an answer. Thank you Ms. Sue
To understand the strategies the author uses to formulate his arguments, we would need to analyze the author's writing style, choice of evidence, logical reasoning, and rhetorical devices. While I don't have access to the specific author and arguments you're referring to, I can certainly guide you on common strategies authors use to make their arguments viable and compelling.
1. Logical Reasoning: Strong arguments typically follow a logical structure. The author might present a clear thesis statement and then provide supporting evidence, which is often presented in a logical order, allowing readers to follow the author's line of thought.
2. Evidence: Compelling arguments are backed by credible and relevant evidence. The author may support their claims with statistics, research findings, expert opinions, or real-life examples. By incorporating reliable evidence, the author strengthens the credibility and persuasiveness of their arguments.
3. Counterarguments: Addressing counterarguments demonstrates the author's awareness of alternative perspectives and enhances the overall strength of their arguments. By acknowledging and refuting opposing views, the author builds a more comprehensive and persuasive case.
4. Rhetorical Devices: Authors often use rhetorical devices to engage the reader emotionally and intellectually. Examples of rhetorical devices include metaphors, analogies, hyperbole, and contrasting ideas. These devices can evoke strong emotions, establish credibility, and make the argument more memorable.
5. Persuasive Language: The author's tone, word choice, and overall language play a vital role in effectively communicating their arguments. By using language that is clear, concise, and impactful, the author can engage the reader and create a persuasive effect.
For a comprehensive analysis of a specific author's strategies and the viability and compelling nature of their arguments, it would be best to examine specific examples and evaluate how these strategies are applied.