The greates threat to individual rights is:
A> the fact that some basic rights,such as privacy,are not expressly listed in the bill of rights
B> a determined majority backed by elected leaders eager to carry out its will
C> the refusal of lower courts to accept the supreme courts rulings in this area
D> conflict between the judicial and legeslative branches over the meaning of these rights in practice
i think it is D.
A> the fact that some basic rights,such as privacy,are not expressly listed in the bill of rights
B> a determined majority backed by elected leaders eager to carry out its will
C> the refusal of lower courts to accept the supreme courts rulings in this area
D> conflict between the judicial and legeslative branches over the meaning of these rights in practice
it is D?
To determine the greatest threat to individual rights among the given options, let's review each choice and evaluate its impact on individual rights.
A> The fact that some basic rights, such as privacy, are not expressly listed in the Bill of Rights:
This option suggests that the absence of explicit inclusion of certain rights in the Bill of Rights poses a threat to individual rights. To assess this, one could consider researching the Constitution and the Bill of Rights to understand the scope of rights protected and whether there are any potential gaps that might compromise individual rights.
B> A determined majority backed by elected leaders eager to carry out its will:
This option implies that a dominant majority, along with their elected representatives who are motivated to implement their agenda, poses a threat to individual rights. To explore the validity of this claim, one could gather information on various instances where the rights of minorities or individuals were potentially compromised due to the actions or decisions of a powerful majority.
C> The refusal of lower courts to accept the Supreme Court's rulings in this area:
This choice suggests that the lower courts' refusal to abide by the rulings of the Supreme Court can jeopardize individual rights. To analyze this, one might research specific cases where lower courts ignored or acted contrary to Supreme Court decisions, leading to the infringement of individual rights.
D> Conflict between the judicial and legislative branches over the meaning of these rights in practice:
This option denotes that conflicts between the judiciary and legislature regarding the interpretation of individual rights could pose a threat. To assess this claim, one could examine examples of clashes between the judicial and legislative branches and their impact on the actual implementation and preservation of individual rights.
By conducting research on each of these options and weighing the evidence, one can arrive at an informed conclusion on which choice presents the greatest threat to individual rights. Remember, understanding the context, historical examples, and legal precedents is crucial to making an accurate assessment.