for these questions pick a,b.c or d.
#6 in recent decades,lobbyists in washington d.c. have incressingly:
A. targeted executive branch in their efforts to influence policy decisions.
B. worked to defeat incumbent members congress in order to replace them with member who would be more supportive
C.relied exclusively on inside lobbying as the means of gaining their policy goals
D. Ignored the judicial branch as a means of influencing policy decisions
This question is somewhat ambiguous. What does your text indicate is the best answer?
i think it is A.
To answer this question, we need to understand the context of lobbyists in Washington D.C. and their activities in recent decades. Let's go through each option and determine the correct answer.
A. Targeted executive branch in their efforts to influence policy decisions.
This option suggests that lobbyists have focused their efforts on influencing policy decisions within the executive branch. While lobbying the executive branch is a common practice, it may not necessarily be the increasing trend in recent decades.
B. Worked to defeat incumbent members of Congress in order to replace them with members who would be more supportive.
This option suggests that lobbyists have been actively trying to remove incumbent members of Congress and replace them with individuals who are more supportive of their policy goals. This option could be a possible answer, as it aligns with the idea of increasing lobbying efforts in recent decades.
C. Relied exclusively on inside lobbying as the means of gaining their policy goals.
This option implies that lobbyists have solely relied on inside lobbying, which refers to direct interactions with policymakers within governmental institutions. While inside lobbying is a commonly used strategy, it may not be the increasing trend in recent decades.
D. Ignored the judicial branch as a means of influencing policy decisions.
This option suggests that lobbyists have ignored the judicial branch as a means of influencing policy decisions. While lobbying efforts within the judicial branch are not as prevalent as those aimed at the legislative and executive branches, it might not necessarily be true that lobbyists have completely ignored the judicial branch.
Based on the analysis, option B appears to be the most plausible answer. Lobbyists increasingly working to defeat incumbents in Congress in order to replace them with more supportive members aligns with the idea of evolving lobbyist practices in recent decades.
Therefore, the correct answer is B. Worked to defeat incumbent members of Congress in order to replace them with members who would be more supportive.