Thursday
March 23, 2017

Post a New Question

Posted by on Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 10:45am.

Professor Nostradamus conducted an empirical or observed communications study in his laboratory where he convincingly found a connection between two variables.

The link concluded that Variable “X” always increased when the subject was exposed to Variable “Y”. By repeating the study over the course of several years he found the same results in his laboratory each time. What can he not say?

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 10:55am

    What do YOU think he can not conclude based on logic? We will be happy to comment after we read your answer.

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 11:11am

    I would say that Professor Nostradamus would not be able to say that his model or theoretical simplified version representation of the real world is an explanatory device, although it can be used to play an important suggestive role in the formulation of his theory. Any thoughts?

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 11:36am

    You did not address the question...The questions does not say anything about a simplified version representation of the real world.

    The question is saying - after years of testing in his laboratory, he has found a consistent connection between two variables... What can he NOT SAY... what is missing in his study?

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 12:09pm

    Can he not say that there isn't a connection between the two variables?

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 12:18pm

    NO...he can't... the studies "in his laboratory" have shown a consistent contection.

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 12:19pm

    What would have to be done to prove that the connection is consistent everywhere.

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 12:23pm

    Further testing. But if he did the same test over and over, he concluded that others would get the same result. So could it be that others results might vary?

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 12:31pm

    Yes, further testing...but there is one thing that can be done that would prove that the testing in "his lab" was valid....

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 12:36pm

    The same tests under different conditions? Or using different subjects? I am lost on this one

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 12:48pm

    RIGHT!!!! the tests have been consistent at HIS lab...to prove that his tests are valid , they would have to be done somewhere else by unbiased testers.... Then he could say that his tests were probably valid.

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 1:01pm

    So he could not say his tests were vaild unless others could verify the results?

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 1:02pm

    Absolutely!!!

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 1:03pm

    If something is to be true, it has to be TRUE everywhere.

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 1:14pm

    Thanks for all your help!

  • Communication Theory - , Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 1:23pm

    welcome entirely <G>

Answer This Question

First Name:
School Subject:
Answer:

Related Questions

More Related Questions

Post a New Question