Posted by y912f on Saturday, June 13, 2009 at 8:43pm.
Oh, my! This question has been debated for 70 years -- and will probably be debated for many more years.
What do you think?
i have no idea
comeon ms.sue pleeease help me
i'm stuck on this
Hindsight is wonderful!
If France and England hadn't appeased Hitler, he probably wouldn't have been as successful in overrunning Europe. They could have at least slowed him down.
On the other hand, France and England hadn't completly recovered from the deadly and devastating effects of World War I. They desperately wanted to avoid another war. They didn't have a crystal ball to foretell the horrors that Germany would bring to Europe in the next few years.
But who knows whether they could have stopped Hitler and the ensuing war. I doubt it. I think he was hell-bent on conquering Europe -- one way or another.
:D i think so too
oh yea..and THANKS A LOT
You're very welcome. Please be sure to write your own answer to this question.
ok, but i was saying thanks for sharing your opinion
Related Questions
US History - 4. If Britain and France had not adopted a policy of appeasement, ...
History - "What position would you take on appeasement if you had been ...
social studies - Identify two reasons that explain why Britain and France ...
History WWII - Can you help me put the following events in order: -hitler ...
History - I have a question about Adolf Hitler. Was Hitler really Jewish? If he ...
us history - How do you think American isolationism and appeasement by Britain ...
NAPOLEON INFORMATION - Imagine that you are a senior advisor to Napoleon. You ...
SoCiAl - Hitler entered France by conquering this nation on its northwestern ...
Socials-Ms. Sue - Ms. Sue I asked my teacher about the memo today, and she said ...
US HISTORY - Despite their losses in the war, France and Britain were as firmly ...
For Further Reading
