Posted by Susan on Sunday, May 31, 2009 at 8:30pm.
This is probably oversimplistic -- but why should oligolopolistic firms merge if they're making a decent profit on their own?
Antitrust laws often keep such mergers from happening.
Further, if the firms are successfully colluding, then they are already maximizing combined profits; a monopoly gets them nothing.
Related Questions
Microeconomics - What are the conditions for an oligolpolistic market? How do ...
Microeconomics - Pareto Efficient - Are all markets with deadweight loss pareto ...
microeconomics - 32. Firm X is a typical firm in a market characterized by the ...
microeconomics - Why do oligopolies exist? list five or six oligopoists whos ...
economics - How would one argue that there is no such things as a natural ...
marketing - Consider competitive markets, monopolies, and oligopolies. What ...
Economics - Assume that there is a perfect competition market for a good X. If ...
economics - How do prices, outputs, and profits differ between oligopolies, and ...
Microeconomics - In a natural monopoly: A) Society would be better off if ...
microeconomics - monopoly vs perfect competition - hi, can sum1 help me? wats ...
For Further Reading