As the case manager, what ethical issues do you encounter in this situation? How can you advocate for your clients’ needs while supporting the dialysis center’s new policy? Under what circumstances would it be appropriate or necessary for a human service organization to make an economic decision that may contradict its code of ethics?
What situation?
What new policy?
What does the code of ethics say?
Please note that we don't do students' homework for them. Be sure to go back into your textbook or use a good search engine. http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/
Once YOU have come up with attempted answers to YOUR questions, please re-post and let us know what you think. Then someone here will be happy to comment on your thinking.
As the case manager, you may encounter several ethical issues in a situation where you need to advocate for your clients' needs while also supporting a dialysis center's new policy. Some of these ethical issues could include:
1. Client Autonomy: Advocating for your clients' needs means respecting their autonomy and their right to make decisions about their own healthcare. If the dialysis center's new policy infringes upon your clients' ability to make informed choices about their treatment, it raises ethical concerns.
2. Beneficence: As a case manager, you have an ethical obligation to ensure the well-being and benefit of your clients. If the new policy adversely affects the quality of care or access to necessary resources for your clients, it may go against the principle of beneficence.
3. Non-Maleficence: This ethical principle emphasizes the duty to do no harm. If the new policy causes harm or has negative consequences for your clients, you need to navigate this ethical dilemma carefully.
Now, let's discuss how you can advocate for your clients' needs while supporting the dialysis center's new policy:
1. Understand the Policy: Thoroughly understand the details of the new policy to identify specific areas of concern that may impact your clients' needs or rights.
2. Communicate with Stakeholders: Engage in open and honest communication with the dialysis center's management, healthcare professionals, and your clients to express concerns and discuss potential solutions.
3. Collaborate and Negotiate: Work collaboratively with the dialysis center to find a middle ground where your clients' needs can be addressed while considering the center's new policy. Finding compromises that ensure client autonomy and benefit is essential.
Regarding circumstances when it may be appropriate or necessary for a human service organization to make an economic decision that contradicts its code of ethics:
Human service organizations and professionals prioritize the well-being and rights of their clients. However, there can be situations where economic pressures or constraints might challenge these principles. Under certain circumstances, organizations may have to deviate from their code of ethics due to financial constraints, such as:
1. Sustainability: Organizations may need to make economic decisions for the long-term sustainability of their operations. This could involve cost-cutting measures, program changes, or efficiency improvements that may contradict their ethical stance.
2. Resource Allocation: In situations where resources are limited, organizations may have to make difficult choices about which services or clients to prioritize. These decisions may not align with their ideal ethical standards.
3. Policy Changes: External factors like policy changes, funding cuts, or economic crises can force organizations to reconsider their priorities and make economic decisions that may be incongruent with their code of ethics.
It is important to note that such decisions should be made after careful deliberation, maintaining transparency, and minimizing potential harm to the affected populations. Organizations should also continually strive to balance economic considerations with their core ethical principles.