Post a New Question


posted by .

Can someone please help me with this because I am lost.
In what circumstances would each approach to stakeholder impact analysis (moral standards, 5-question, and Pastin’s approach) be most useful? Generalize about the approaches and describe when each would be most or least useful.

  • Accounting -

    Five Question

    Evaluate each alternative on:
    Profitability (shareholders)
    Legality (society at large)
    Impact on the rights of stakeholders
    Impact on sustainable development (environment)

    Moral Standards Approach (Velasquez)
    Is the decision:
    Of net benefit to society
    Fair to all stakeholders (fair distribution of benefits and burdens)
    Consistent with each person’s rights

    Pastin’s approach (Pastin)
    Ground rule ethics (organization/individual rules and values)
    End-point ethics (greatest net good for all concerned)
    Rule ethics (determine ethical boundaries to take into account – impingement of rights)
    Social contract ethics (how to move boundaries)


Answer This Question

First Name:
School Subject:

Related Questions

More Related Questions

Post a New Question