I am trying to analyze the following article. I understand its meaning and the majority of the quesitons, but this one question is stumping me.
The author uses Nows and Laters as nouns. How are they described?
-by sense of action
or by sense of infinite
I know the other chioces are wrong
Also, is there any good to this world, or is the world of immortality a place of no escape? In another part of the article, it mentions that the only way to escape is to die, but I cannot decide if that makes the statement "immortality a place of no escape false?"
Strangely, the population of each city splits in two: the Laters and the Nows.
The Laters reason that there is no hurry to begin their classes at the university, to learn a second language, to read Voltaire or Newton, to see promotion in their jobs, to fall in love, to raise a family. For all these things, there is an infinite span of time. In endless time, all things can be accomplished. Thus all things can wait. Indeed, hasty actions breed mistakes. And who can argue with their logic? The Laters can be recognized in any shop or promenade. They walk an easy gait and wear loose-fitting clothes. They take pleasure in reading whatever magazines are open, or rearranging furniture in their homes, or slipping into conversation the way a leaf falls from a tree. The Laters sit in cafes sipping coffee and discussing the possibilities of life.
The Nows note that with infinite lives, they can do all they can imagine. They will have an infinite number of careers, they will marry an infinite number of times, they will change their politics infinitely. Each person will be a lawyer, a bricklayer, a writer, an accountant, a painter, a physician, a farmer. The Nows are constantly reading new books, studying new trades, new languages. In order to taste the infinities of life, they begin early and never go slowly. And who can question their logic? The Nows are easily spotted. They are the owners of the cafes, the college professors, the doctors and nurses, the politicians, the people who rock their legs constantly whenever they sit down. They move through a succession of lives, eager to miss nothing. When two Nows chance to meet at the hexagonal pilaster of the Zahringer Fountain, they compare the lives they have mastered, exchange information, and glance at their watches. When two Laters meet at the same location, they ponder the future and follow the parabola of the water with their eyes.
I know my question is long, but I really have thought through this for the past hour and I can't decide between the two choices for the 2 questions
Nows and Laters are decided by a sense of action...living in the moment or not.
The Nows consider immortality an opportunity for infinite adventure.
To answer your first question, you need to determine how the author describes "Nows" and "Laters" as nouns. The passage provides descriptions for both groups, which will help you choose the correct answer between "sense of action" or "sense of infinite."
For the Nows, the passage states that "with infinite lives, they can do all they can imagine." This suggests that their description emphasizes their ability to take immediate action and engage in various experiences without delay. They begin early, never go slowly, and are constantly seeking new opportunities and knowledge.
On the other hand, the Laters reasoning is that there is no hurry or need to rush, as there is an infinite span of time to accomplish things. They can wait for everything, avoiding hasty actions and potential mistakes. They are described as walking an easy gait, wearing loose-fitting clothes, and finding pleasure in simple activities like reading magazines or rearranging furniture.
Based on these descriptions, the Nows are depicted with a strong emphasis on action and immediacy, while the Laters are characterized by a sense of infinite time and a more relaxed approach.
Therefore, the correct answer to the question "How are they described - by sense of action or by sense of infinite?" is that the author describes the Nows and the Laters by sense of action and sense of infinite, respectively.
Regarding your second question about the notion of good in the world of immortality and whether immortality is a place with no escape, let's examine the relevant statements from the article.
The passage mentions that the only way to escape the world of immortality is by dying. However, this claim might be a paradox or a provocative statement rather than a factual statement. It could be implying that immortality does not provide an actual escape from the cycle of life, as death is still the ultimate escape. Therefore, saying that immortality is a place with no escape could be seen as a rhetorical statement rather than a literally accurate one.
To determine if there is any good in the world of immortality, you need to consider the perspectives of both the Nows and the Laters, as described in the passage. The Nows find value in experiencing infinite lives and having the opportunity to do everything they can imagine. They embrace new careers, relationships, and pursuits, constantly seeking novelty and variety.
The Laters, on the other hand, believe that there is no need to hurry because they have infinite time. They find pleasure in a more relaxed and contemplative approach to life, enjoying activities like reading and conversation.
From these perspectives, you can see that both the Nows and the Laters find value in their respective approaches to immortality. The Nows appreciate the possibilities and variety that infinite lives offer, while the Laters find contentment in the freedom and lack of urgency that infinite time provides.
In conclusion, the article suggests that there is subjective value and goodness in the world of immortality, but the nature of this value differs between the Nows and the Laters.