Posted by Camilla on Tuesday, March 17, 2009 at 6:35pm.
I agree with your answer.
Thank You!! Happy St. Patricks Day
You're welcome!
Erin Go Bragh!! :-)
I disagree. The "invisible hand" has nothing to do with moral precepts.
The firm is a profit maximizer. It provides a product and changes the maximum amount it thinks it can. People willing to pay the price do so. So the product goes to those people willing and able to pay the highest price. Perhaps immoral, but exactly what the "invisible hand" concept predicts. (Goods go to those folks willing to pay the most).
Now then, one could argue, the firm is acting as a monopolist and this is a form of market failure where there are some people willing to pay more for a product than it costs to produce. A fair point, I would counter with the invisible hand is working, but not perfectly.
Related Questions
accounting - hey there, i was wondering if anyone could help me with the ...
economics in healthcare - 6. Calculate Herfindahl Index and Concentration Ratios...
accounting - Brianna Moore is an accountant for New World Pharmaceuticals. Her ...
college biology-drug metabolism - You are interested in examining the metabolism...
Biology - What ethical issues might arise when a drug company funds trials of a ...
Economics/Social Studies - Please help me with this it's about the invisible...
economics - Why might it be appropriate for the government to allow a ...
city college - (Drug Benefits and Post Retirement Liabilities) Delphi Company ...
econ 460 - 1. The demand for a new drug is given by P = 4 0.5Q. The ...
Economics Today the micro view 13th edition - A British pharmaceutical company ...
For Further Reading