Can you read my conclusion for me. He said that it only had to be a couple sentences long. The restatement of thesis, last strong point about what were arguing, and an exit sentence. Do you think that this is good or have any ideas on what I should add? How's the grammar?
Therapeutic cloning is clearly an ethical and effective way to treat some life-threatening diseases. This type of cloning may have the potential to ease human suffering and save millions of lives. Hopefully, society will see the light at the end of the tunnel and believe that therapeutic cloning can possibly be a life saver for many in the future.
Your conclusion is good. :-)
One suggestion, though. "will seee the light at the end of the tunnel" is trite and could be replaced with a different phrase.
How about?
will come to understand and support therapeutic cloning.
Thank you!!
You're welcome.
Based on the information provided, it seems like your conclusion is concise and covers the key points. Here's a breakdown of your conclusion:
1. Restatement of thesis: "Therapeutic cloning is clearly an ethical and effective way to treat some life-threatening diseases."
- This sentence reaffirms the main argument or point you have been making throughout your paper.
2. Last strong point about what you were arguing: "This type of cloning may have the potential to ease human suffering and save millions of lives."
- This sentence summarizes one of the strongest points supporting your argument, emphasizing the positive impact of therapeutic cloning.
3. Exit sentence: "Hopefully, society will see the light at the end of the tunnel and believe that therapeutic cloning can possibly be a lifesaver for many in the future."
- This sentence serves as a closing thought that expresses your hope and encourages society to recognize the potential benefits of therapeutic cloning.
In terms of grammar, your conclusion appears to be well-written. The sentences are clear and concise, and there are no obvious grammar issues.