Monday

September 1, 2014

September 1, 2014

Posted by **juvi** on Wednesday, February 25, 2009 at 10:18pm.

a) At 5% level of significance, is there sufficient evidence of an improvement lately with respect to passing on the first try? (your conclusion must be in terms of p value as well as setting up a rejection region.please show necessary work)

b)which statistical distribution should be applied in this situation and why? (explain)

c)knowing that a monetary investment is required to take preparatory actions, should we put much weight on the conclusion of part (a) EXPLAIN

d)Based on a 95% confidence level, what is the best case and worst case scenario regarding the actual percentage of applicants who pass on their first try?

e)carefully interpret the interval estimation

f)using the results of part (d) explain carefully whether or not there is sufficient evidence of an improvement lately with respect to passing on the first try?

NOTE:Please Include all assumptions and refrain from using electronic applications like megastat etc. Show workings as much as possible. cheers

- statistics -
**MathGuru**, Thursday, February 26, 2009 at 8:48amI'll give you several tips to get started on this one and let you take it from there.

Null hypothesis:

Ho: p = .44 -->meaning: population proportion is equal to .44

Alternative hypothesis:

Ha: p > .44 -->meaning: population proportion is greater than .44

Using a formula for a binomial proportion one-sample z-test with your data included, we have this:

z = .52 - .44 -->test value (130/250 = .52) minus population value (.44)

divided by √[(.44)(.56)/250] -->.44 represents 44%, .56 represents 56% (which is 1-.44), and 250 is sample size.

Do the above calculation to get the z-test statistic. To find the p-value, which is the actual level of the test statistic, check a z-table for the p-value.

If the p-value is greater than .05, the null is not rejected. If the p-value is less than .05, then the null is rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis and you can conclude p > .44 (there is enough evidence to support the claim that there is an improvement).

Note:

Use the appropriate confidence interval formula for part d.

I hope this will help.

**Related Questions**

Statistic - A training center claims that 75% of people taking national exam on ...

stats - Relatively speaking, which statistics exam did you do better on? On ...

*****Help Statistic - Imagine taking a 10-question true or false exam. You ...

Statistics - In Professor Smith's statistics course, the correlation between ...

physics - Spaceship I, which contains students taking a physics exam, approaches...

physics - Spaceship I, which contains students taking a physics exam, ...

FINITE MATH - Applicants who wish to be admitted to a certain professional ...

penn foster world history - see ive passed Foragers,farmers,and Builders (exam ...

statistics - For a particular sample of 50 scores on a psychology exam, the ...

statistics - Answer the question(s) based on the following situation: 150 ...