Posted by genia on Saturday, February 7, 2009 at 2:10pm.
Well, it is probably the best answer A, B, D are clearly wrong.
Here is a quote that is worth reading
<<The greater attention and encouragement from parents should contribute to first-borns' greater sense of worth and importance; and first-borns' typically greater power and competence compared with younger siblings should result in more favorable social comparisons. Research, however, provides only modest (and inconsistent) support for these expectations (Blake 1989). Oldest and only children do seem to have higher self-esteem than later-born children, but the differences are not significant. The effects of birth order may be suppressed or mitigated by the influence of several other features of the sibling system, such as sex composition of the sibling order, child spacing, family size, age and sex of target child, and age and sex of next oldest sibling. Without taking into account the effect of these other variables, the influence of birth order on self-esteem may largely disappear (Gecas and Pasley 1983).>>
http://family.jrank.org/pages/1476/Self-Esteem-Family-Interaction-Self-Esteem.html
Related Questions
psychology - In the Jeeter family, Jason is the oldest,his sister, Barbara, is ...
social studies - Barbara's due date was over 2 weeks ago. Dr. Sally told ...
Math - Three brothers divide 17 candy bars. The oldest child gets 1/2, the ...
math - Three brothers divide 17 candy bars. The oldest child gets 1/2, the ...
math - Below is a sample space for a family with 3 children. BGG stands for the ...
child psychology - Charles Darwin is considered a pioneer in the study of child ...
Child Psychology - Charles Darwin is considered a pioneer in the study of child ...
math - Below is a sample space for a family with 3 children. BGG stands for the...
geometry - Using the information about John, Jason, and Julie, can you uniquely ...
English - Hi there, I am currently in the progress of writing a essay for my ...
For Further Reading