Posted by sxxx123456 on Saturday, January 17, 2009 at 12:39pm.
Not my thing :(
I would suggest you try to compute the lebesgue measure of E(1,2) first without being rigorous.
Use the principle of inclusion and exclusion to evaluate the probability that a randomly drawn number in the interval (0,1) does not contain a 1 or 2.
Then, use your computation to give a rigorous proof using the properties of the Lebesgue measure.
Related Questions
math - Let E(1,2) be the set of all numbers in (0,1) such that their decimal ...
Lbesgue measure - Let E(1,2) be the set of all numbers in (0,1) such that their...
pls help :( - Let E(1,2) be the set of all numbers in (0,1) such that there ...
lebesgue measure - Let E(1,2) be the set of all numbers in (0,1) such that there...
math - Decimal numbers with digits both before and after the decimal point, such...
Math - The least upper bound of a set of real numbers in (0,1) whose decimal ...
Math Word Problem - Let A be the set containing all rational numbers that are ...
math proof - how can i prove that for any set of real numbers, there is at least...
math - The following numbers can be represented as 8-bit numbers in the binary ...
math - Rewrite the following using mathematical symbols: a. Q is equal to the ...
For Further Reading