3. Consider the following ethical dilemma that was discussed earlier in this chapter:

Under the reduction in force (RIF) format, the supervisor, me, gets told on
2. Discussion Question 1
• Due Date: Day 2 [Main] forum
• Post your response to this question: Answer Question 3 on p. 150 (Ch. 6) in Ethical
Leadership in Human Services regarding the ethical dilemma of a reduction in force
(RIF).

Thursday what supervisees have to come in on Friday to get chopped, and they are
to be gone that day. . . . I personally believe that that’s unethical . . . not because it’ssevere, but because it’s not balanced . . . We would not tolerate any employee doing
that to us.

http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1231864278

Is this what you're writing?

. . . . I personally believe that that’s unethical . . . not because it’ssevere, but because it’s not balanced . . . We would not tolerate any employee doing that to us.

I don't know how you're being graded on this or how long or how detailed your response needs to be. Here are the issues I see in what you have so far:

* Why all the ellipses? When a sentence ends, there needs to be a period. The next sentence needs to begin with a capital letter.

* "I personally" is redundant. Would you be writing impersonally?? =)

* "that that's" = exactly what is that second "that" referring to? Be specific.

* What do you mean by "it" and "severe"? (And don't forget the space between "it's" and "severe" if you decide to keep this phrasing.)

* What do you mean by "not balanced"? What would "balanced" be?

* Who are "we" and "us"?

* What is "that" (again)?

If I were grading, I would give this response a zero because it's filled with vague generalities and no specifics or logic.

To answer Question 3 on page 150 of the book "Ethical Leadership in Human Services" regarding the ethical dilemma of a reduction in force (RIF), you need to analyze the situation and make a judgment about whether the supervisor's actions are ethical or not.

To begin, let's break down the scenario and the question itself. The supervisor in this case is informed on Thursday which employees are going to be laid off the next day, Friday. The supervisor expresses that they believe this practice is unethical because it lacks balance and fairness. They argue that they would not tolerate any employee treating them in the same way.

To address this ethical dilemma, you need to evaluate the actions of the supervisor and consider various ethical theories or principles that may apply. Here is a step-by-step approach to help you analyze the situation:

1. Identify the stakeholders: Start by identifying the individuals or groups affected by the supervisor's actions. This may include the employees being laid off, the remaining employees, the organization, and even the supervisor themselves.

2. Consider ethical theories: Think about different ethical theories or principles that could be applied to the situation. Some common approaches include utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. Each of these theories has its own set of considerations and principles that can guide your analysis.

3. Evaluate fairness and justice: Assess whether the supervisor's actions are fair and just. Consider whether all individuals involved are being treated equitably, and whether there are any biases or preferential treatment in the decision-making process.

4. Assess the supervisor's role and responsibility: Determine whether the supervisor has a duty of care or any responsibilities towards the employees affected by the layoff. Consider their ethical obligations as a supervisor and whether they are fulfilling them.

5. Reflect on personal values: Take into account your own values and beliefs regarding fairness and justice. This can help inform your overall assessment and judgment of the situation.

Based on your analysis, you can then form an opinion on whether the supervisor's actions are ethical or not. This should be supported by logical reasoning and an understanding of ethical principles. Remember to consider different perspectives and potential counterarguments when forming your opinion.

Note: This answer provides a general framework for analyzing the ethical dilemma but does not give a direct answer to Question 3 in the book. To answer the specific question, you need to apply the suggested steps to the scenario discussed earlier and provide your own response based on the ethical considerations discussed.