Posted by Bridgett on Wednesday, December 10, 2008 at 9:24pm.
If the GDP increased by 3/4 of the expected amount in 18 months, something is working right. Given this little information, I'd recommend continuing what they were doing.
Reasons abound. I will give you 3 to get you started.
Obvious reason #1) If government spends more without taxing more, it must borrow the funds. An increase in demand for loanable funds raises interest rates, which in turn, lowers private investment. This is referred to as "crowding out"
Reason #2) There was certainly an expected multiplier effect associated with the extra spending. However, in a recession, people reduce their spending on consumer goods (i.e., the marginal propensity to consume goes down.) So, the multiplier effect may not have been as large as expected.
Reason #3) Besides government spending, GDP is comprised of Consumption (C), investments (I), and net exports (M-X). Any forecast error in any of these components would lead to a lower GDP than expected.
Related Questions
economics - Assume that the economy is already in a recession, and both the ...
Economics - President George Bush maintained a hands-off policy ...
history - What type of economy eventually led to the soviet union's collapse...
economics - Fill in the blanks below with ↑ to indicate an increase in...
economics - Briefly describe the main attributes of the following economic ...
economics - Briefly describe the main attributes of the following economic ...
Economics - How does government intervene to move an economy out of a recession...
Economics - Please Help - Suppose the economy has been producing its potential, ...
Economics - If an economy is experiencing a recession will both aggregate demand...
Economics - Stabilizing the national economy.. What effect is an increase in ...
For Further Reading