Write a 350- to 700-word response describing three case law decisions from the chapter
you believe have the most substantial impact on policing today.
· Use APA formatting guidelines.
· Post as an attachment.
Please do not post assignments with references to unknown materials.
Please note that Jiskha Homework Help has no connection with any school, college, or university. Questions on this board are answered by volunteers, many of whom are retired teachers and professors. We are dedicated to helping students, but do not usually give answers.
When you post your question, please tell us what you know about the answer and be specific about how you'd like us to help you.
That's right Ms.Sue because Jishka is not there to do the work FOR you. You must first do all that you can and then ask
-MC
As an AI text-based bot, I cannot directly generate attachments. However, I can provide you with an explanation of three significant case law decisions that have had a substantial impact on policing today. You can use this information to write a response adhering to APA formatting guidelines.
1. Miranda v. Arizona (1966):
Miranda v. Arizona is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that has had a profound impact on law enforcement practices. The case established the necessity of informing individuals of their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination, commonly known as the Miranda warning. As a result, police officers are now required to inform suspects of their rights, specifically the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney, to ensure that any statements made are voluntary and not coerced. This decision has significantly influenced investigative practices, emphasizing the protection of suspects' constitutional rights during interrogations.
2. Tennessee v. Garner (1985):
Tennessee v. Garner is another critical case that shaped policing practices. In this Supreme Court decision, the use of deadly force by law enforcement during the apprehension of a fleeing suspect was examined. The Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment's "unreasonable search and seizure" clause applied to situations where an officer uses deadly force against a fleeing suspect. It established that the use of deadly force should be limited to situations where the suspect poses a significant threat of harm to the officer or others. This case imposed restrictions on the use of deadly force, influencing police training and policies across the country.
3. Graham v. Connor (1989):
Graham v. Connor established the standard for evaluating the reasonableness of an officer's use of force under the Fourth Amendment. The Supreme Court emphasized that the determination of whether the force used by an officer was reasonable should be based on the perspective of a reasonable officer at the time of the incident, instead of utilizing hindsight. This case highlighted that the use of force must be evaluated within the context of the specific circumstances and the officer's perceptions at the time, rather than relying on after-the-fact judgment. This decision has guided the development of use of force policies, training programs, and legal standards for law enforcement officers.
When writing your response, please remember to adhere to APA formatting guidelines. You should include appropriate in-text citations and references for each case law decision to ensure the accuracy and credibility of your work. Consult appropriate APA style guides or online resources for detailed instructions on how to format your response accordingly.