Posted by Bridgett on Wednesday, December 3, 2008 at 1:50pm.
However, if a person has a prior criminal record, it is more likely she will commit another crime. When person with no record commits crime, it makes sense to give him the benefit of the doubt and give him a light sentence.
The seriousness of the crime is a factor — that's what distinguishes between most misdemeanors and felonies.
You are phrasing previous record in an all-or-nothing manner. In contrast, it is more a matter of probabilities. Past behavior is a relatively good indicator — all other things being equal — of what to expect in future behavior. However, in real life, "all other things" are not equal. This is a fact that makes prediction difficult.
There is also the intent of the perpetrator. Did s/he intend harm?
I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.
Related Questions
English 7: Wk Sht - Perseverance - I have to answer these 4 questions and in ...
Agree or disagree with this statement US history - Agree or disagree and why?-- ...
math - statement: Middle-school stundents do not know enough about pet nutrition...
English - I am writing an essay about James Baldwin's Go Tell It on the ...
rousseau - hi rousseau's beleives that man is good by nature. do you ...
Social St. - Is it right how the Supreme Court Justices are appointed? And why ...
History - A political scientist aruges that we have made all the constitutional ...
science - What do you think of carbon offsets. Do you agree/disagree?
science - What do you think of carbon offsets. Do you agree/disagree?
Geography - #49. It has been said that Eastern Europe is a political region more...
For Further Reading
