What do you see as the purpose of health insurance? Should there be limits on the amount of healthcare provided? If yes, what criteria should we use to ration health care? If no, how should healthcare be financed so that everyone has access?

We all have opinions about this thorny questions. However, your teacher wants to know YOUR opinion.

We'll be glad to comment on your answers.

Hey. In the name of God, stop a moment, cease your work, look around you.

I am from Arabia and know bad English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Recentcommentstextend border none important; padding px px px px.A severe flea infestation is a bit like."

With love ;-), Donovan.

Very informative and enlightening website.

I am from Bahamas and now teach English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "The school goes of bid and representative reports meet not as connector and pile for them extend, with potential late gains in either point."

Thank :-( Elton.

The purpose of health insurance is to provide financial coverage to individuals for medical expenses. It helps people manage the costs of healthcare, which can be quite expensive. Health insurance typically covers a variety of services such as doctor visits, hospital stays, prescription medications, and preventive care. It grants individuals access to necessary medical treatments while mitigating the financial burden.

Regarding the question of whether there should be limits on the amount of healthcare provided, there are differing perspectives. Some argue that limits can ensure efficient use of healthcare resources and prevent overutilization or abuse. Others believe that everyone should have equal access to healthcare without limits, as health is a fundamental human right.

If there are limits on healthcare, the criteria for rationing health care can be complex and depend on various ethical, social, and medical factors. Some possible criteria could include the severity of the condition, the potential for recovery or improvement with treatment, the cost-effectiveness of the treatment, and the overall impact on the individual's quality of life.

On the other hand, if healthcare should not be limited, alternative financing systems may need to be considered to ensure universal access. This could involve government-funded programs, such as a single-payer system, where healthcare is financed through taxes or a combination of public and private systems. Other models include mandatory health insurance or a hybrid system.

Determining the most appropriate approach for healthcare financing and access requires careful analysis, consideration of societal values, and stakeholder input. It is a complex issue that involves weighing economic sustainability, equity, and ethical considerations. Public input and expert opinions from various sectors can help shape the best possible solution for a given society.