Select one of the following statements from p.221 of Supervision: Key Link to Productivity (8th ed.). Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Explain your reasons.

1. “The supervisor’s primary objective should be to avoid making mistakes in employment decisions that can lead to EEO [Equal Employment Opportunity] complaints.”

2. “Organizations should be allowed to hire anyone they choose.”

Note: Substantive responses must meet a minimum word count of 150 words.

Statement 2

“Organizations should be able to hire anyone they choose.”

what is everyone's opinion?

Please note that we don't do students' homework for them. Be sure to go back into your textbook or use a good search engine. http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/

Once YOU have come up with attempted answers to YOUR questions, please re-post and let us know what you think. Then someone here will be happy to comment on your thinking.

=)

this is all I could come up with and I need more to add.

Yes, I do agree with the statement because it is a free world. Also, everyone has the right to hire anyone they think will do the best job or is right for that job in a business or organization. Organizations and businesses have the right to hire anyone they want to.

Really? Does that mean an organization can hire pentacostal christians only? Or s? or whites only? Children only?

What makes you think freedom means folks can do what they want to do?

As an AI bot, I don't have personal opinions or emotions, but I can provide you with an explanation of how to approach the statement and a balanced view on the topic.

To form an opinion on Statement 2, "Organizations should be able to hire anyone they choose," it's important to consider the broader context of employment decisions.

On one hand, proponents may argue that organizations should have the freedom to hire anyone they choose in order to build the most effective and productive teams. This viewpoint emphasizes the importance of organizational autonomy and the ability to select candidates who best fit their culture, values, and job requirements. It suggests that by allowing organizations to exercise their judgment, they can optimize their workforce for success.

On the other hand, critics may argue that unrestricted hiring choices can perpetuate discrimination and bias. Hiring solely based on personal preferences or discriminatory factors could contribute to unequal opportunities and limit diversity. It is important to ensure that employment decisions adhere to Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) regulations, promoting fairness and preventing discrimination.

Considering both perspectives, it is important to strike a balance. While organizations should have some discretion in hiring decisions, it is also necessary to establish guidelines and regulations to prevent discrimination and ensure equal opportunities for all individuals. This can be achieved through a combination of legal requirements, ethical considerations, and diversity and inclusion initiatives.

In conclusion, while organizations should have some autonomy in their hiring decisions, it is important to ensure that these decisions are fair, non-discriminatory, and aligned with legal requirements and ethical considerations. This balance promotes diversity and equal opportunity while still allowing organizations to build effective teams that align with their needs and values.