Posted by John on Tuesday, October 28, 2008 at 9:41pm.
There is one quote but i forgot who said this:
"no science can replace a myth, and no myth can ever replace science."
Basically I think what it means is that literature and science are complete opposites.
Hope that helps.
I dont know if I or Jules Verne would agree with the proposition. Nor would I think that Isaac Asimov would agree.
My oh my, here's #1, a negative opinion about anything NOT science!
1. http://www.in-my-opinion.org/in-my-opinion-5316.html&sid=9bdda5e241c5d1de1e6fbaa3b5c9ddb3
2. (a Russian viewpoint): http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VBR-4R5R8JW-4&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=1f0ccd1bf7216cf3caf0738a92d4e457
3. (misconceptions): http://www.geocities.com/otisbrown17268/scihist.html
NOTE: What made you say that literature thinks of science in a negative way?
Sra
Related Questions
literature - if someone has time could you provide me with examples of What ...
Literature for Jim - literature - Jim, Monday, November 2, 2009 at 8:46am I need...
English - Determine whether the statement represents a progressive view or a ...
Literature - Can someone help me?I have some literature homework to finish up ...
Hspanic Literature - Need someone to proofread a college papaer for a Spanish ...
Psychology - I am having trouble understanding the following question: What ...
Literature - iam writting a term paper on the relationship between literature ...
Literature - I math::7D=1W 7 days=1week Question: Literature "S.W." ...
Literature 1010 - Transitions function much like road signals. A) True B) False ...
English - I need help figuring out what the writing style was for medieval ...
For Further Reading
