Posted by G on Monday, October 27, 2008 at 6:43am.
1) I would go with C, increases a firms costs.
2) Hummm, a confusing question, which needs clarification and simplifying assumptions. I presume the farmer does not get rid of half of his labor as a result of losing half of his land. Since each laborer has less land to work with the MP of labor should go down. Second, assuming the lost land is measurably no different from the remaining land, the farmer simply has less land. Since we are assuming diminishing return, the MP of land should go up. I would go with B.
Related Questions
economics (micro) - 2. In the table below, assume a monopsonist has the marginal...
Microeconomics - Monopolistic Competition A profit-maximizing firm in a ...
College microeconomics - Need some help with these questions....Thanks in ...
economics - Complete the following table for the firm below which is selling its...
economics question!! - Suppose a firm is both a monopoly and a monopsony. How ...
Finance - The current market wage rate is $10, the rental rate of land is $1,...
Economics - explain how a firm's production function is related to its ...
Microeconomics - I am on the chapter for the factors of production: Question: A ...
Business Econ - I need my answers checked for this question, thanks. A firm'...
microeconomics - Explain how the following events would affect the demand for ...
For Further Reading