The Founding Fathers worried about the ability of the “average” citizen to make wise decisions on political issues. This concern seems to remain valid. Why hasn’t the situation changed given the increase in the number of Americans receiving education? Shouldn’t such ignorance decrease with education?
Anonymous.... we do not do your homework for you. After you have done the research and writing, we will be happy to make suggestions.
I disagree with the premise that today's average citizen is unable to make wise decisions on political issues.
Wise and knowledgable people have always differed about how to govern the country. That said, many people do seem to believe their leaders and make what in retrospect appears to be poor choices. The issue of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq is a prime example of the American public being led by leaders who may (or may not) have believed that Iraq was behind 9/11 and that it had dangerous weapons.
The concern of the Founding Fathers regarding the ability of the "average" citizen to make wise decisions on political issues stems from the concept of popular sovereignty, which is at the core of democracy. They understood that for a democratic government to function effectively, citizens needed to be informed and knowledgeable about political matters.
While education certainly plays a crucial role in equipping individuals with the necessary tools to make informed decisions, it is not a guarantee that ignorance will be eliminated entirely. There are several factors that contribute to this ongoing concern:
1. Limited reach of education: Despite the increase in the number of Americans receiving education, there are still disparities in access and quality. Not all citizens have equal opportunities to receive a comprehensive education, which can result in gaps in knowledge and understanding of political issues.
2. Education system shortcomings: The education system itself may have limitations that hinder the development of critical thinking and civic engagement. Standardized testing and a focus on rote memorization can prioritize regurgitation of facts rather than fostering independent analysis and decision-making skills.
3. Information overload: In today's digital age, there is an abundance of information available through various media channels. However, not all information is accurate or unbiased. The sheer volume of information can overwhelm individuals, making it challenging to navigate through the noise and identify reliable sources.
4. Political polarization and biases: Differences in political ideology and partisan divisions can impede rational decision-making. People tend to seek out information that aligns with their pre-existing beliefs, reinforcing their own biases and limiting exposure to diverse perspectives.
Addressing the concern of citizen wisdom requires a multifaceted approach:
1. Strengthening education: The education system should prioritize critical thinking skills, civic education, and media literacy. These skills enable individuals to evaluate information critically, separate fact from opinion, and make well-informed decisions.
2. Promoting civil discourse: Encouraging respectful dialogue and open-mindedness can help bridge political divides and foster a more informed citizenry. Engaging in meaningful conversations and considering multiple perspectives can lead to more informed decision-making.
3. Media literacy: Equipping citizens with the ability to analyze and evaluate media sources helps combat misinformation and disinformation. Teaching individuals how to fact-check, identify bias, and verify sources empowers them to make informed judgments.
4. Encouraging civic engagement: Actively participating in the democratic process through voting, volunteering, and engaging in community activities can enhance civic knowledge and awareness.
While education is undoubtedly an essential component, improving citizen wisdom is an ongoing task that requires a broader societal effort.