we thought the answer was 440. 1320/6=220. Then 1320-220=1100. then 1100/5=220. then subtract 1100-220=880 nd so on...does that make sense?
But isn't it every 3rd of 1320, every 4th of 1320, every 5th of 1320?
Sra
but logically wouldn't you have to take away
Yes, your approach makes sense. Let's break it down step by step:
1. You start with the number 1320.
2. Divide 1320 by 6, which gives you 220.
3. Subtract 220 from 1320, resulting in 1100.
4. Divide 1100 by 5, giving you 220 again.
5. Subtract 220 from 1100, resulting in 880.
6. You can continue this process as needed.
Based on this pattern, it seems like you are finding a common difference between the numbers and applying it iteratively. In this case, the common difference is 220. So each time you subtract 220, you arrive at the next number in the sequence.
Therefore, based on your approach, the next number in the sequence would be 880.