Please check my answers if they are correct. Thank you.

THE QUESTION:
Mark runs a business that sells guitars. In an average year, he receives $900 000 from sales of guitars. Of the sales revenue, he must pay the manufacturer a wholesale cost of $600 000; he also pays wages and utility bills totalling $200 000. If he does not operate this guitar business, he can work in another business and receive an annual salary of $65 000. He owns his showroom; if he chooses to rent it out, he will receive $40 000 in rent per year. Assume that the value of this showroom does not depreciate over the year. No other costs are incurred in running this guitar business.

i. What are Mark’s explicit costs of selling guitars? Select all that apply.

a) The salary Mark could earn if he worked in another business
b) The wages and utility bills that Mark pays
c) The wholesale cost for the guitars that Mark pays the manufacturer
d) The rental income Mark could receive per year if he chose to rent his showroom out

ii. What is the accounting profit of Mark’s guitar business?

iii. What is the economic profit of Mark’s guitar business?

iv. Taking into accounting Mark’s implicit costs of doing business as well as his explicit costs, if Mark’s only goal is to earn as much economic profit as possible, he ________ (should or should not) continue to stay in the guitar business.

-------------------

MY ANSWER:
i. a, b
ii. $900 000
iii. $100 00
iv. He should continue because he is not losing any profits.

First, I am a little concerned about the word, "explicit." I assume that explicit costs are those costs with an actual dollar outlay. (e.g., accounting costs). Further, I will assume that costs that are not explicit (i.e., implicit costs) are the opportunity costs of running the business.

That said, I disagree with all of your answers:

i) the explicit costs are b and c, the wholesale costs of the guitars and the wages and utility bills.
ii) Accounting profits are the 900,000 sales less the explict costs of 600,000 and 200,000 = $100,000
iii) The economic profit would also subtract out Mark's opportunity costs of running the business; the lost salary of 65,000 and the lost rent of 40,000. Economic profit is -$5,000
iv) Mark should quit the guitar business and take the salary of 65,000 and the rent of 40,000 and

Your answers are mostly correct, but there are a couple of minor errors.

i. The correct answer is a) The salary Mark could earn if he worked in another business and b) The wages and utility bills that Mark pays. These are the explicit costs of selling guitars as they involve actual cash outlays.

ii. The accounting profit of Mark’s guitar business can be calculated by subtracting the explicit costs from the sales revenue. In this case, the accounting profit would be $900,000 - ($600,000 + $200,000) = $100,000.

iii. The economic profit considers both explicit costs and implicit costs. Implicit costs are the opportunity costs of using resources for one purpose instead of their next best alternative use. In this case, the implicit costs are the salary that Mark could earn if he worked in another business and the rental income he could receive per year if he chose to rent out his showroom. Therefore, the economic profit would be $100,000 - ($65,000 + $40,000) = -$5,000. It is negative because the economic profit is less than the opportunity cost of using the resources in other businesses.

iv. Based on the economic profit calculations, if Mark's only goal is to earn as much economic profit as possible, he should not continue to stay in the guitar business. This is because his economic profit is negative, indicating that he would be better off financially by using his resources in other businesses where he could earn a higher profit.

Overall, your understanding of the concepts is good, but be sure to double-check your calculations and consider both explicit and implicit costs when determining profit.