There are a large number of supporters for both the command economy and the welfare state. A question arises as to which system is better. Suppose you are required to support the position that the command economy is vastly superior. State some arguments that could be used to defend this position.
Ashley, we do not do your homework for you. I suggest that you take your book and a sheet of paper. Fold the paper in half. As you skim the book write on one half the arguments for a command society and on the other half, the argumets for a welfare state. Then you will be able to write. Repost and one of the teachers will be happy to make comments or suggestions.
haha yeah i know
but okay ill try that
I need help with my homework........... this is the question........... Are monsoons a blessing or a curse for the subcontinent?
Rachel, please don't butt into another person's question and answer thread.
Click Post a New Question and then ask your question.
what is meaning of motto,or short saying ,on the great seal
To support the position that a command economy is vastly superior, you could present the following arguments:
1. Resource Allocation: A command economy allows the government to have control over the allocation of resources. This ensures that resources are used strategically and efficiently, as decisions are made based on the overall needs and goals of the society. This approach reduces wastage and ensures that resources are directed towards essential sectors such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
2. Economic Stability: In a command economy, the government has the ability to intervene in times of economic crises. This allows for quick and decisive measures to be taken to stabilize the economy, such as implementing price controls, regulating production, and providing financial support to struggling businesses. By having a centralized decision-making authority, a command economy can potentially prevent large-scale economic downturns and protect the welfare of its citizens.
3. Social Equality: The command economy system can promote a more equal distribution of income and wealth by reducing income disparities. Through government control, policies can be implemented to ensure fair wages, tackle income inequality, and provide equal opportunities for all citizens. This can lead to greater social cohesion and reduce social tensions that may arise from vast wealth gaps in market-driven economies.
4. Long-term Planning: A command economy can be advantageous for long-term planning and investment in strategic industries. The government can, for instance, prioritize investments in renewable energy, infrastructure development, and technological advancements, which might be overlooked or underfunded in market economies driven by short-term profit motives.
It's important to note, however, that these arguments represent a specific perspective and that there are also valid counterarguments against a command economy. To fully understand the debate between command economies and welfare states, it is crucial to consider both sides of the argument.