In some countries such as AUSTRALIA, citizens are required BY LAW to vote in a national election.If they are over 18-years-old they must be registerd to vote and if they fail to go to their polling place on election day, they may be subject to a fine.
And the quetion is SHOULD THE UNITED STATES ADOPT THE SAME SYSTEM?.....
//////please help me if you can i just need some ideas..
If everyone were required to vote, theoretically everyone would have a voice in government.
But would they? Would some people turn in a nearly blank ballot? Would some people just mark anything?
How do you think people who don't want to vote would feel? Are their feelings important?
Another thought -- would more people vote if registering to vote and obtaining absentee ballots were easier? Would more people vote if elections were held on Saturday -- or if all election days were legal holidays?
Is it the American way to force people to vote? Or would forcing people to vote be more like traffic laws?
My opinion - Yes, all citizens should be required to vote. If you want to enjoy the privilege of a democracy, representative govt., then you have an obligation to vote. I also think that one should have a driver's license that can be marked when voting and if it is not marked then you lose the privilege of driving. I am just one of those people who believes that you earn privileges by accepting responsibilites.
Does republican democracy still work if it is forced?! Should not the right to refuse to do something be a free choice as well so long as it does infringe on the liberties of others?!
To determine whether the United States should adopt a mandatory voting system like Australia, we can consider several factors and ideas:
1. Democratic Values: One perspective is that mandatory voting upholds democratic values by ensuring that citizen voices are heard and represented. It promotes civic duty and encourages a more engaged and inclusive electorate.
2. Increased Participation: Proponents argue that mandatory voting could increase voter turnout, reducing voter apathy and making elections more representative of the entire population. They believe it would result in a more accurate reflection of public opinion.
3. Education and Awareness: Implementing mandatory voting would require efforts to educate citizens about their rights and responsibilities as voters. This could involve strengthening civic education in schools and providing accessible and unbiased information about candidates and issues.
4. Informed Voting: Critics argue that enforcing mandatory voting might lead to uninformed or coerced voting. To address this concern, steps can be taken to promote a well-informed electorate through initiatives like voter education campaigns and unbiased information about candidates and issues.
5. Personal Freedom: Opponents argue that mandatory voting infringes upon individual freedom and the right to choose whether or not to participate in the electoral process. They advocate for the importance of voluntary participation as a reflection of personal beliefs and values.
6. Alternatives to Encourage Participation: Instead of mandatory voting, the United States could explore alternative methods to increase voter participation, such as automatic voter registration, expanded early voting periods, making Election Day a national holiday, or implementing ranked-choice voting to encourage a broader range of candidates.
7. Consider Cultural and Legal Context: The United States has a different political and legal system than Australia, and the implementation of mandatory voting would require careful consideration of its compatibility with the American democratic framework.
It is important to note that these points are simply ideas and perspectives to consider. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not the United States should adopt a mandatory voting system would require a comprehensive examination of various factors, including legal, cultural, social, and political implications.