Sunday

March 29, 2015

March 29, 2015

Posted by **Beth** on Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 6:15pm.

- Math -
**bobpursley**, Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 6:18pmWouldn't first + (first +30) be 170

so two firsts would be 140 so the first would be ....

and the second one 30 more.

- Math -
**Beth**, Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 6:28pmI still don't quite get how you are explaining it. Can you explain in a different way?

- Math -

**Answer this Question**

**Related Questions**

math - First of all I don't just need the answer I need it explained where a ...

Math - I don't understand. I am in third grade and I just need the answer. Maybe...

chemistry - i don't understand any of this ! I'm doing the STP & stuff like that...

Physics - Which of Newtons laws would best explain what causes a basketball to ...

Government - Hello, I need this question explained. You dont have to give me the...

Math - I need to express the following in equivalent form: m-2/m^2-5m+6 , 2x+6/x...

Math (Trying to understand) 4th - Hi I need help with something. I need to ...

History - Hi I need some help with my history homework I have answer all of the ...

English - Could someone explain how to identify first person, first peripheal, ...

math problems - thanks alot for giving me those sites but i already know this ...