Posted by Beth on Thursday, September 18, 2008 at 6:15pm.
Wouldn't first + (first +30) be 170
so two firsts would be 140 so the first would be ....
and the second one 30 more.
I still don't quite get how you are explaining it. Can you explain in a different way?
Related Questions
math - First of all I don't just need the answer I need it explained where a...
Math - I don't understand. I am in third grade and I just need the answer. ...
math - i really need help in math. im just in 6 grader and i don't ...
chemistry - i don't understand any of this ! I'm doing the STP & ...
math - I am a third grader and have a homework of sketching and labeling all ...
English - Could someone explain how to identify first person, first peripheal, ...
algebra II - 5 3 4 . 4 _______ 6 4 I really need help with this math..I don'...
History - Hi I need some help with my history homework I have answer all of the ...
Math - I need to express the following in equivalent form: m-2/m^2-5m+6 , 2x+6/x...
accounting HELP - I know what the moral standards approach is, but what I do not...
For Further Reading