Post a New Question

business law

posted by .

G starts a fire that soon consumes Poor P's trailer. G did not know that the trailer was occupied and had no reason to know this, but it was. After rushing into the trailer to save her child, P is severely burned. P sues G in negligence. Assuming that G has breached a duty, what two arguments might he make in defense? Assume that the traditional negligence defenses apply. Will these arguments work here?

  • business law -

    Look up ...
    implied assumption of risk
    contributory negligence

Answer This Question

First Name:
School Subject:

Related Questions

More Related Questions

Post a New Question