G starts a fire that soon consumes Poor P's trailer. G did not know that the trailer was occupied and had no reason to know this, but it was. After rushing into the trailer to save her child, P is severely burned. P sues G in negligence. Assuming that G has breached a duty, what two arguments might he make in defense? Assume that the traditional negligence defenses apply. Will these arguments work here?
Look up ...
implied assumption of risk
contributory negligence