Here is my sentece outline for this thesis Native American Indian names, mascots and logos in all sports from elementary schools to professional teams can be offensive to some people not to others. Can you tell me if it is ok?

I. Several organizations are say that using the Native American names and mascots are offensive, however, most Americans including American Indians believe that using Native American names and mascots are not offensive.
A. A. The names are not offensive
B. Using the tomahawk chop is very degrading.
C. By using mascots and logos are contributing to stereotypes.

No, Its not OK..... So Don't do it.

Your sentence outline seems generally clear and structured. However, there are a couple of minor improvements you can make in terms of grammar and clarity. Here's a revised version:

I. Introduction
A. Statement of the issue: The use of Native American Indian names, mascots, and logos in sports from elementary schools to professional teams
B. Thesis statement: While several organizations argue that using these names and mascots is offensive, it is a subject of debate as many Americans, including some Native Americans, do not find them offensive.

II. Arguments supporting the non-offensiveness of Native American names and mascots
A. Many Americans, including Native Americans, do not find these names offensive
B. The association of the tomahawk chop with Native Americans can be seen as degrading
C. The use of mascots and logos may perpetuate stereotypes

By following this outline, you can present a clear and organized argument regarding the differing opinions on the offensiveness of Native American names, mascots, and logos in sports.