What visualization tool would be best suited for displaying all of the heights (in feet) of the top 50 tallest buildings in the United States?

bar graph
relative-frequency histogram
histogram
stem-and-leaf display
time-series graph

We'll be happy to check your answer.

i would think a bar graph

I agree!

In order to determine the best visualization tool for displaying the heights of the top 50 tallest buildings in the United States, we need to consider the nature of the data and the specific requirements of the task.

Since we are dealing with a single variable (height) and want to compare the heights of different buildings, a bar graph would be a suitable choice. A bar graph presents the data in separate vertical bars, with the height of each bar representing the frequency or value of a category or group. In this case, each building would be represented by a bar, and the height of the bar would correspond to the height of the building.

A relative-frequency histogram could also be a good choice. A histogram is similar to a bar graph but with continuous data. It divides the range of values into equal intervals or bins, and the height of each bar represents the frequency or relative frequency of values falling within that bin. In this case, we would divide the height range into intervals and plot the frequency or relative frequency of buildings falling within each interval.

A stem-and-leaf display would not be the most appropriate choice for this scenario. A stem-and-leaf display is used to show the distribution of a dataset, but it is more suitable for smaller datasets with discrete values. Since we have a large dataset (top 50 tallest buildings), a stem-and-leaf display may become cluttered and harder to interpret.

A time-series graph would not be suitable for displaying the heights of buildings, as time is not a relevant variable in this case.

Therefore, the best options for displaying the heights of the top 50 tallest buildings in the United States would be a bar graph or a relative-frequency histogram. Both methods effectively present the data and allow for easy comparison and analysis.