What are the key difference between subjective and non-subjective issues?
Here are good working definitions
subjective-
Proceeding from or taking place in a person's mind rather than the external world: a subjective decision.
non-subjective
undistorted by emotion or personal bias
So... what is the basic difference?
Looking up the two words in a dictionary would be a good idea . . .
These terms can be viewed on a continuum, with subjective at one end and objective at the other. However, nobody can be completely objective. If you have no emotional involvement with an issue/topic, you would not bother to get involved with it. Why would you get involved with anything, if you had no emotional involvement? You must have some level of interest.
However, you can be more objective by noting your emotional involvement and taking it into account in your evaluation of the issues.
I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.
Subjective and non-subjective issues refer to the nature of the topic being discussed and how it can be evaluated. Here are the key differences between them:
1. Subjective Issues: These are matters that are based on personal opinions, feelings, or perspectives, and they can vary from person to person. Examples of subjective issues include taste in music, favorite color, or preferences in food. They cannot be objectively proven or disproven. To identify subjective issues, you need to ask yourself if the topic is influenced by personal bias or individual experiences.
2. Non-Subjective Issues: These are matters that can be objectively measured, verified, or proven through evidence or logical reasoning. Non-subjective issues are not influenced by personal opinions, emotions, or individual perspectives. Examples of non-subjective issues include scientific theories, mathematical equations, or historical facts. To identify non-subjective issues, you need to look for information that can be supported by evidence or objective criteria.
To determine whether an issue is subjective or non-subjective, you should consider the following steps:
1. Evaluate the basis of judgment: If the issue relies on personal preferences, tastes, or emotions, it is likely to be subjective. On the other hand, if the issue can be backed up by objective evidence, logical reasoning, or measurable data, it is likely to be non-subjective.
2. Consider different perspectives: If different individuals can have different opinions or interpretations of the issue without a clear-cut right or wrong answer, it is likely to be subjective. However, if there is a consensus among experts or objective criteria that can determine the issue, it is likely to be non-subjective.
3. Look for supporting evidence: Determine if there is evidence available that supports or refutes the issue. If there is empirical evidence, measurable data, or logical reasoning that can be used to validate or invalidate the issue, it is likely to be non-subjective. If the issue lacks such evidence and relies solely on personal opinions, it is likely to be subjective.
In summary, subjective issues are based on personal opinions and can vary from person to person, while non-subjective issues can be objectively measured, verified, or proven through evidence or logical reasoning.